On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:42:22 GMT, Justin King <jck...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Allow building OpenJDK with UBSan. Currently the build fails when optimizing 
>> the image due to lots of undefined behavior (it invokes the built JVM). 
>> Follow up PRs will either replace the undefined behavior with well defined 
>> behavior or suppress errors which are intentional. The goal is to make 
>> OpenJDK more well defined and thus more portable across compilers and 
>> architectures.
>
> Justin King has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Simplify logic for including __ubsan_default_options
>   
>   Signed-off-by: Justin King <jck...@google.com>

Sorry for the late review.

"Magic" solutions like this is always a bit scary. But we have some precedence 
in terms of the "autoheaders" for assembly files, so I guess this is not worse.

However, I do think the included source files should be treated like the 
autoheaders, and reside in data rather than in `src`. The latter is intended 
for buildtools, even though they are a bit scattered at the moment (there is a 
long-standing JBS bug about fixing that), and these are not really intended to 
be compiled into a product by itself, rather as something "injected" into all 
builds. I'd recommend `make/data/ubsan`, and perhaps skip the leading `__`.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11604

Reply via email to