On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:14:30 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Improvements to support OS specific customization for JDK internal use:
>>  - To select values and code; allowing elimination of unused code and values
>>  - Optionally evaluated by build processes, compilation, or archiving (i.e. 
>> CDS)
>>  - Simple API to replace adhoc comparisons with `os.name`
>>  - Clear and consistent use across build, runtime, and JDK modules
>>  
>> The PR includes updates within java.base to use the new API.
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix indentation and improve exception message

src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/OperatingSystem.java line 29:

> 27: 
> 28: /**
> 29:  * Enumeration of operating system types and testing for the current OS.

Would it be more correct to say an enumerating of operating system names rather 
than types?

src/java.base/unix/classes/java/lang/ProcessImpl.java line 405:

> 403: 
> 404:             case Windows: throw new AssertionError("Unsupported 
> platform: " +
> 405:                     OperatingSystem.current());

This is switch on a enum so if a new port is added then this will just fall 
through silently, whereas I think you want it to fail.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12931

Reply via email to