On Thu, 18 May 2023 15:20:22 GMT, Kim Barrett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Use
>>
>> struct shmid_ds shm_buf{};
>>
>> to _value-initialize_. Calls the default constructor if there is one.
>> Otherwise, performs _zero-initialization_,
>> which is what we want here.
>
> The final suggested change (to direct-value-initialize the object) seems to
> have *not* been made.
>
> However, I think it doesn't matter. The mentioned restriction against being
> non-empty until C23 is not relevant.
> This is C++, not C. Empty initializers are, and have always been, permitted
> by C++.
Strange the last resulting change I see is
`struct shmid_ds shm_buf{};`
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13953#discussion_r1200056697
