On Mon, 22 May 2023 07:09:30 GMT, JoKern65 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The final suggested change (to direct-value-initialize the object) seems to
>> have *not* been made.
>>
>> However, I think it doesn't matter. The mentioned restriction against being
>> non-empty until C23 is not relevant.
>> This is C++, not C. Empty initializers are, and have always been, permitted
>> by C++.
>
> Strange the last resulting change I see is
> `struct shmid_ds shm_buf{};`
That's not what I see in this PR, and not what I see in the repository after
the integration. Where are you seeing
that? (If in your local repository, maybe you forgot a push to the PR?)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13953#discussion_r1203353066
