On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 07:20:15 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarr...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> This change needs to be motivated. One way to do that would be to file CRs to 
> change the style guide to permit various features. Label them with `cpp17`. 
> Discuss them prior to making the language change, describing why they are 
> important. A sufficient set of such provides an argument for making the 
> language change.

Is it impractical to drop the obsolete features of C++11, working in the common 
subset of C++11 and C++17?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14988#issuecomment-1684883361

Reply via email to