On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:28:12 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa <d...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> The goal of this PR is to address the follow-up comments to the SIMD 
>> accelerated sort PR (#14227) which implemented AVX512 intrinsics for 
>> Arrays.sort() methods.
>> The proposed changes are:
>> 
>> 1) Restriction of the AVX512 sort acceleration to only Intel CPUs. A 
>> performance regression (due to micro-architectural differences) was reported 
>> for AMD Zen4 CPUs in the comments section of PR.
>> 2) Addressing the build failure due to a bug in GCC 12 (which was fixed in 
>> version 12.3.1). The details of the bug are at: 
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
>> 3) Minor changes in Javadoc strings
>
> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add @ForceInline annotation to insertion and mixedInsertion sort

make/modules/java.base/Lib.gmk line 230:

> 228:       CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS_JDKLIB) $(LIBFFI_CFLAGS), \
> 229:       LDFLAGS := $(LDFLAGS_JDKLIB) \
> 230:                  $(call SET_SHARED_LIBRARY_ORIGIN), \

If you are going to fix the indentation here, please do it to follow the code 
conventions for the build system:
https://openjdk.org/groups/build/doc/code-conventions.html

2. If a line must be broken, use four spaces for indentation.
18. Avoid padding internally in a line with spaces to try to align some feature 
into columns with surrounding lines.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16124#discussion_r1355763767

Reply via email to