On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:40:36 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> The contents of the build README has been poorly kept up to date in places. 
> With the move to Github, the need to have markdown syntax that looks good on 
> Github has become apparent. The entire document has been in need for a while 
> of a comprehensive oversight to be made more consistent in language and 
> formatting.
> 
> Here is a summary of the most important changes:
> 
> * The entire section on cross-compiling have been restructured to be more 
> logical, and some parts have been rewritten, so it reads more coherent.
> * A section on "make doctor" has been added
> * The fixpath.sh script has been explained more in detail (and references to 
> the old fixpath binary removed)
> * Information about MSYS2 and WSL has been updated
> * References to how things were done in the past, like the hg forest have 
> been removed
> * Version numbers have been updated where needed
> * Some specific paragraphs about e.g. boot JDK detection have been clarified
> * Example output have been updated
> * Remaining references to `run-test` have been updated to just `test`
> * Internal links have been fixed in a few places
> * A few remaining places that confuses "OpenJDK" with the "JDK" have been 
> fixed
> * Markdown formatting has been improved in some places
> * The entire file has gotten more normalized markdown formatting (fix bullet 
> list indentation, add empty lines surrounding the code block markers, etc)
> 
> Note that this PR will can possibly create a merge conflict with 8317357 and 
> 8264425; my intention is to integrate these two first and then resolve any 
> conflicts in this PR.

doc/building.md line 42:

> 40: 
> 41: If you just want to use the JDK and not build it yourself, this document 
> is not
> 42: for you. See for instance [OpenJDK 
> installation](http://openjdk.org/install)

Switch to https? Same for other uses of http:// later in the file?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16696#discussion_r1396333621

Reply via email to