On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:33:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The contents of the build README has been poorly kept up to date in places. 
>> With the move to Github, the need to have markdown syntax that looks good on 
>> Github has become apparent. The entire document has been in need for a while 
>> of a comprehensive oversight to be made more consistent in language and 
>> formatting.
>> 
>> Here is a summary of the most important changes:
>> 
>> * The entire section on cross-compiling have been restructured to be more 
>> logical, and some parts have been rewritten, so it reads more coherent.
>> * A section on "make doctor" has been added
>> * The fixpath.sh script has been explained more in detail (and references to 
>> the old fixpath binary removed)
>> * Information about MSYS2 and WSL has been updated
>> * References to how things were done in the past, like the hg forest have 
>> been removed
>> * Version numbers have been updated where needed
>> * Some specific paragraphs about e.g. boot JDK detection have been clarified
>> * Example output have been updated
>> * Remaining references to `run-test` have been updated to just `test`
>> * Internal links have been fixed in a few places
>> * A few remaining places that confuses "OpenJDK" with the "JDK" have been 
>> fixed
>> * Markdown formatting has been improved in some places
>> * The entire file has gotten more normalized markdown formatting (fix bullet 
>> list indentation, add empty lines surrounding the code block markers, etc)
>> 
>> Note that this PR will can possibly create a merge conflict with 8317357 and 
>> 8264425; my intention is to integrate these two first and then resolve any 
>> conflicts in this PR.
>
> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Some additional grammatical or readability fixes

Looks good! I like the automated grammar/spelling corrections.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16696#pullrequestreview-1737755403

Reply via email to