On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 23:50:46 GMT, Sam James <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The LFS64 symbols provided by glibc are not part of any standard and were >> gated behind -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE in musl 1.2.4 (to be removed in 1.2.5). >> This commit replaces the usage of LFS64 symbols with their regular >> counterparts and defines -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, ensuring that functions >> will always act as their -64 variants on glibc. > > Sam James has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in > by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since > the last revision: > > - Merge master > - crank copyright > - sendfile64 -> sendfile > > Signed-off-by: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> > - buf64->buf > > Signed-off-by: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> > - Add message for assert > > Not all C++ stds implement it w/o. > - Add off_t static_asserts > > Signed-off-by: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> > - Do not use LFS64 symbols on Linux > > The LFS64 symbols provided by glibc are not part of any standard and > were gated behind -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE in musl 1.2.4 (to be removed in > 1.2.5). This commit replaces the usage of LFS64 symbols with their > regular counterparts and defines -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, ensuring that > functions > will always act as their -64 variants on glibc. > > Signed-off-by: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> Could someone run the other commands again for older branches for me as well? I don't have access. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16329#issuecomment-1903889096
