On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:58:05 GMT, Hamlin Li <m...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi, >> Can you help to review this patch? >> Thanks >> >> This is a continuation of work based on [1] by @XiaohongGong, most work was >> done in that pr. In this new pr, just rebased the code in [1], then added >> some minor changes (renaming of calling method, add libsleef as extra lib in >> CI cross-build on aarch64 in github workflow); I aslo tested the combination >> of following scenarios: >> * at build time >> * with/without sleef >> * with/without sve support >> * at runtime >> * with/without sleef >> * with/without sve support >> >> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234 >> >> ## Regression Test >> * test/jdk/jdk/incubator/vector/ >> * test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorapi/ >> >> ## Performance Test >> Previously, @XiaohongGong has shared the data: >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234#issuecomment-1767727028 > > Hamlin Li has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fix jni includes Hello @PaulSandoz, For various reasons, [previous pr](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234) and current pr are thought not good enough, so I did some exploration of [integrating sleef source into jdk](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294#issuecomment-2018839778), the solution itself is simple and maintainace is easy. I saw in the previous discussion, you had some [comments about integrate sleef source into jdk](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234#issuecomment-1821885433). I'm not sure if you're avaialbe to take a look and continue the discussion and share your opinions? If positive, we can start from [here](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294#issuecomment-2020986186). Thanks! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18294#issuecomment-2023136169
