Thank you for your reply.
I tried without those flags and got the same error message
$ bash configure --with-boot-jdk=/c/Users/Anil/OpenJDK/jdk-22.0.1
...
configure: Using default toolchain microsoft (Microsoft Visual Studio)
configure: error: Cannot locate a valid Visual Studio installation
configure exiting with result code 1

checking the shortnames.

C:\>dir /x
Directory of C:\
06/29/2024  09:43 PM    <DIR>          PROGRA~1     Program Files
03/01/2024  06:34 PM    <DIR>          PROGRA~2     Program Files (x86)

Directory of C:\PROGRA~1
C:\PROGRA~1>dir /x
06/29/2024  09:43 PM    <DIR>                       Microsoft Visual Studio

Directory of C:\PROGRA~2
C:\PROGRA~2>dir /x
06/29/2024  09:41 PM    <DIR>          Microsoft Visual Studio

I don't see any shortnames set.

In the Visual Studio Installer, both Visual Studio Build Tools 2019 and
Visual Studio Community are set.
When I click on the Build Tools, I see the checkbox for Desktop C++ is
checked.


I saw that the C++



On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 1:24 PM Chen Liang <liangchenb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Usually Microsoft Visual Studio c compiler (as installed by Visual Studio
> installer) already has short names set. It seems the short name has to be 8
> characters in length and you can't set it when some process is running in
> that directory. You can check the short path in Windows cmd's "dir /x"
> command. And try configure without --with-toolchain-version and
> --with-tools-dir and only set these flags if it fails without those flags:
> you declare version is 22 but you point to MSVC 2019's directory, and you
> should point to the bin directory within the VC directory.
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:57 PM Anil <1dropafl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Update:
>> I was able to get past the error
>> I installed Visual Studio 2022, rebooted, but it still cannot detect it.
>>
>> PS C:\> fsutil file setshortname "Program Files (x86)" PROGRA~1
>> Error:  Access is denied.
>>
>> PS C:\Program Files (x86)> fsutil file setshortname  "Microsoft Visual
>> Studio"  Microsoft_Visual_Studio_2019
>> Error:  The parameter is incorrect.
>>
>> $ bash configure --with-boot-jdk=/c/Users/Anil/OpenJDK/jdk-22.0.1
>> --with-toolchain-version=2022 --enable-debug --with-tools-dir="C:\Program
>> Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\BuildTools\VC"
>>
>> configure: Using default toolchain microsoft (Microsoft Visual Studio)
>> configure: The path given by --with-tools-dir does not contain a valid
>> configure: Visual Studio installation. Please point to the VC/bin or
>> VC/bin/amd64
>> configure: directory within the Visual Studio installation
>> configure: error: Cannot locate a valid Visual Studio installation
>> configure exiting with result code 1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 8:50 PM Anil <1dropafl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> (changed Subject line. was: Is anyone able to build the JDK on Windows
>>> using VirtualBox to host Ubuntu?)
>>>
>>> I downloaded and unzipped openjdk.
>>> $ ls
>>> jdk  jdk-22.0.1  openjdk-22.0.1_windows-x64_bin.zip
>>>
>>> but still I get the same error message
>>>
>>> configure: Could not find a valid Boot JDK. OpenJDK distributions are
>>>> available at http://jdk.java.net/.
>>>> configure: This might be fixed by explicitly setting --with-boot-jdk
>>>> configure: error: Cannot continue
>>>> configure exiting with result code 1
>>>
>>>
>>> I am wondering if I should *not *install the Open JDK in the directory
>>> created by Cygwin (/c/Users/Anil/OpenJDK) but install it in the /cygdrive
>>> Windows folders?
>>> (I observe that the folder created in Cygwin is not visible outside, in
>>> Windows even after rebooting the laptop).
>>> Can someone please confirm?
>>> thanks,
>>> Anil
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 6:48 PM Anil <1dropafl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you. I installed Cygwin on my Windows 11 laptop, and after
>>>> overcoming some minor blocks, ran 'bash configure'.
>>>> Am I correct in assuming that I also need to have Open JDK installed,
>>>> not the Oracle JDK?
>>>> I have Java 17 from Oracle installed.
>>>>
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using JAVA_HOME
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-17.0.4.1 is); ignoringot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
>>>> (build 17.0.4.1+1-LTS-2, mixed mode, sharing)
>>>> configure: (Your Boot JDK version must be one of: 22 23 24)
>>>> checking for javac...
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/common~1/oracle/java/javapath/javac.exe
>>>> checking for java...
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/common~1/oracle/java/javapath/java.exe
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-17.0.4.1)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-17.0.4.1 is); ignoringot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
>>>> (build 17.0.4.1+1-LTS-2, mixed mode, sharing)
>>>> configure: (Your Boot JDK version must be one of: 22 23 24)
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-11.0.10)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-11.0.10 is ); ignoringot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
>>>> 18.9 (build 11.0.10+8-LTS-162, mixed mode)
>>>> configure: (Your Boot JDK version must be one of: 22 23 24)
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/javafx-sdk-11.0.2)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/javafx-sdk-11.0.2 did not contain bin/java;
>>>> ignoring
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-17.0.4.1)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-17.0.4.1 is); ignoringot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
>>>> (build 17.0.4.1+1-LTS-2, mixed mode, sharing)
>>>> configure: (Your Boot JDK version must be one of: 22 23 24)
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-11.0.10)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/jdk-11.0.10 is ); ignoringot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
>>>> 18.9 (build 11.0.10+8-LTS-162, mixed mode)
>>>> configure: (Your Boot JDK version must be one of: 22 23 24)
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/javafx-sdk-11.0.2)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at
>>>> /cygdrive/c/progra~1/java/javafx-sdk-11.0.2 did not contain bin/java;
>>>> ignoring
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk-17.0.4.1)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at /cygdrive/c/Program
>>>> Files/Java/jdk-17.0.4); ignoringot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
>>>> 17.0.4.1+1-LTS-2, mixed mode, sharing)
>>>> configure: (Your Boot JDK version must be one of: 22 23 24)
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk-11.0.10)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at /cygdrive/c/Program
>>>> Files/Java/jdk-11.0.1); ignoringot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build
>>>> 11.0.10+8-LTS-162, mixed mode)
>>>> configure: (Your Boot JDK version must be one of: 22 23 24)
>>>> configure: Found potential Boot JDK using well-known locations (in
>>>> /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/javafx-sdk-11.0.2)
>>>> configure: Potential Boot JDK found at /cygdrive/c/Program
>>>> Files/Java/javafx-sdk-11.0.2 did not contain bin/java; ignoring
>>>> configure: Could not find a valid Boot JDK. OpenJDK distributions are
>>>> available at http://jdk.java.net/.
>>>> configure: This might be fixed by explicitly setting --with-boot-jdk
>>>> configure: error: Cannot continue
>>>> configure exiting with result code 1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:06 AM <erik.joels...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Anil,
>>>>>
>>>>> Building in a VM on a laptop should be doable, but given how resource
>>>>> intensive the JDK build is, you could run into problems like you describe.
>>>>> You are most likely to get the best build performance running natively on
>>>>> the machine and OS you have, so my recommendation is to build for Windows
>>>>> in your case. If you still prefer to build for Linux, I think the best
>>>>> option is to use WSL. See doc/building.md for instructions on how to build
>>>>> for Linux in WSL. To build for Windows, I recommend installing Cygwin as
>>>>> the most straightforward and well tested option for a POSIX support layer
>>>>> on Windows. Once installed, you won't need to run any Windows commands as
>>>>> Cygwin emulates a Linux/Unix environment. Again see doc/building.md for
>>>>> instructions on how to install a build environment on Windows.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Erik
>>>>> On 6/27/24 04:51, Anil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to try out a small contribution to the JDK and want to build
>>>>> the JDK first.
>>>>> I have a Windows 11 laptop.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not comfortable with the Windows commands and someone mentioned
>>>>> in this forum that most of the building is done on Linux.
>>>>> So I installed VirtualBox 7.0.18 and Ubuntu 24.04. however I was
>>>>> getting black screens and freezing. I downgraded the Ubuntu to 222.04 and
>>>>> still got black screens. I don't know why this is happening.
>>>>> Any advice appreciated.
>>>>> Anil
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024, 7:25 PM Anil <1dropafl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> I want to try out a small contribution to the JDK and wanted to
>>>>>> build the JDK first,
>>>>>> before I change the code.
>>>>>> I forked and cloned the jdk following the instructions at The
>>>>>> OpenJDK Developers' Guide – OpenJDK Developers’ Guide
>>>>>> <https://openjdk.org/guide/#cloning-the-jdk>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am on Windows 11.
>>>>>> These instructions are given on the page but I am unsure which of
>>>>>> these to execute since I have already forked and cloned the git repo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ wget 
>>>>>> https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk16/7863447f0ab643c585b9bdebf67c69db/36/GPL/openjdk-16_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz
>>>>>> $ tar xzf openjdk-16_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz
>>>>>> $ sudo apt-get install autoconf zip make gcc g++ libx11-dev libxext-dev 
>>>>>> libxrender-dev libxrandr-dev libxtst-dev libxt-dev libcups2-dev 
>>>>>> libfontconfig1-dev libasound2-dev
>>>>>> $ cd jdk
>>>>>> $ sh ./configure --with-boot-jdk=$HOME/jdk-16/
>>>>>> $ make images
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do I still need to do the wget?
>>>>>> Also, I wondered if I should use book jdk-17 instead of jdk-16 as in
>>>>>> the instructions above.
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> Anil
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to