On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 08:28:35 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <[email protected]> wrote:
> [JDK-8374507](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8374507) forced me to look > into debug info sizes again. And I remembered that GCC actually have > debug-level support, which can select what kind of diagnostic data is in the > debug info. See: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/Debugging-Options.html > > Allowing users to configure the debug level allows two major deviations from > the default level (2): > level=1: significantly reduce the debug info size, but still allow backtrace > reconstruction > level=3: add even more debugging info, like macro expansion, into the debug > data > > This RFE upstreams the variant the patch that I have been using in > builds.shipilev.net binaries: the fastdebug variants there are done with GCC > level=1, greatly optimizing the debug binary sizes, while still maintaining > the major benefit of debug binaries -- rich crash diagnostics. > > I threw in this option into current GHA builds to conserve more disk space on > runners and/or transfers. > > I am open for bikeshedding on the option name :) make/autoconf/flags-cflags.m4 line 72: > 70: DEBUG_PREFIX_CFLAGS= > 71: > 72: UTIL_ARG_WITH(NAME: fine-debug-level, TYPE: string, How about `debug-info-level`? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29056#discussion_r2665018759
