On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 08:28:35 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <[email protected]> wrote:

> [JDK-8374507](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8374507) forced me to look 
> into debug info sizes again. And I remembered that GCC actually have 
> debug-level support, which can select what kind of diagnostic data is in the 
> debug info. See: 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/Debugging-Options.html
> 
> Allowing users to configure the debug level allows two major deviations from 
> the default level (2):
>  level=1: significantly reduce the debug info size, but still allow backtrace 
> reconstruction
>  level=3: add even more debugging info, like macro expansion, into the debug 
> data
> 
> This RFE upstreams the variant the patch that I have been using in 
> builds.shipilev.net binaries: the fastdebug variants there are done with GCC 
> level=1, greatly optimizing the debug binary sizes, while still maintaining 
> the major benefit of debug binaries -- rich crash diagnostics.
> 
> I threw in this option into current GHA builds to conserve more disk space on 
> runners and/or transfers. 
> 
> I am open for bikeshedding on the option name :)

I think this is a good idea.

make/autoconf/flags-cflags.m4 line 75:

> 73:     DEFAULT: 2,
> 74:     RESULT: FINE_DEBUG_LEVEL,
> 75:     DESC: [Sets the fine-tuned debug level, when debug info generation is 
> enabled],

I think we should clarify that this only applies to GCC and Clang.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29056#pullrequestreview-3631080013
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29056#discussion_r2665086250

Reply via email to