On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:01, Paul Fox wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > It would be a lot easier for me to have the ip application in the same > > > place as the original iproute2. In fact it makes things alot more easy > > > to have the busybox applications in the same place as the original apps. > > > (not first time i meet this kind of problems) > > > > $PATH? > > no, his problem is that other apps refer to ip via its full path. > $PATH isn't always the answer.
Which is kind of negates the reason why we have PATH in the first place. "Other apps" should be fixed to not use full paths. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
