> On Tuesday 11 September 2007 05:01, Paul Fox wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > > It would be a lot easier for me to have the ip application in the same > > > > place as the original iproute2. In fact it makes things alot more easy > > > > to have the busybox applications in the same place as the original > > apps. > > > > (not first time i meet this kind of problems) > > > > > > $PATH? > > > > no, his problem is that other apps refer to ip via its full path. > > $PATH isn't always the answer. > > Which is kind of negates the reason why we have PATH in the first place. > > "Other apps" should be fixed to not use full paths.
sorry. when i said "$PATH isn't always the answer", i meant, "sometimes just using $PATH won't solve your problem". if you don't control the app, and it contains a hard-coded path, then $PATH won't help. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
