Benjamin Kiener wrote: > Hi, everybody. > > As I read in the TODO, the situation of keeping several shells is > undesireable for some users and developers of busybox, so I'd like to help > to change that. Can anyone (Rob?) give me a more concret summary, how I can > help as a programmer? And is there any need for an make alternative in > busybox? > > Benjamin > >
hi Benjamin, it is nice that you want to help. IMHO we need: - testcases , just port the checks from coreutils and friends an adapt them for bb - documentation, something every programmer loves best done with above - examples how to use busybox best - there are several shell it would be nice to merge them into one - look into programs and change parameters (buffersize, paths etc.) and see if it break something we should update our TODO list :) re, wh _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
