On Saturday 16 February 2008, Benjamin Kiener wrote: > As I read in the TODO, the situation of keeping several shells is > undesireable for some users and developers of busybox, so I'd like to help > to change that. Can anyone (Rob?) give me a more concret summary, how I can > help as a programmer?
Denis has taken over as the maintainer. he's gotten the shell situation improving drastically, but the TODO is still relevant: merge the now three shells into 1 POSIX functional that still works on no-mmu. > And is there any need for an make alternative in busybox? i'd say no -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
