On Tuesday 05 May 2009 04:16:07 Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Mike Frysinger writes: > > is there any reason to keep the busybox.net website in the > > busybox.git ? yes, it allows it to be included in the release > > tarball, but i really dont think that is necessary. having a > > dedicated repo like the other projects makes more sense to me. > > Well, uclibc has a seperate repo, but buildroot does it like > busybox. I have asked the osuosl.org staff to fix the website update > script to work with git, but that's still pending.
i already fixed it and uclibc.org is working off of the git repo now > It's not that the website changes very often. What would a seperate > repo buy us? git cannot checkout a subrepo like svn, thus the entire repo needs to be checked out in order to get at just the website while buildroot doesnt do releases like uclibc/busybox, the same argument holds there: having the website in the tarball doesnt really make sense as it really isnt useful -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
