On Tuesday 05 May 2009 05:51:55 Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> Mike Frysinger writes: >>> Well, uclibc has a seperate repo, but buildroot does it like >>> busybox. I have asked the osuosl.org staff to fix the website update >>> script to work with git, but that's still pending. >> >> i already fixed it and uclibc.org is working off of the git repo now > > Ok, could you then please check the script for buildroot?
i said i fixed the script ... i didnt say i converted the buildroot website >>> It's not that the website changes very often. What would a seperate >>> repo buy us? >> >> git cannot checkout a subrepo like svn, thus the entire repo needs to be >> checked out in order to get at just the website >> >> while buildroot doesnt do releases like uclibc/busybox, the >> same argument > > Huh? Buildroot has releases - I released 2009.02 back in February, and > am just now doing the last changes for 2009.05-rc1. *shrug* i haved followed nor used buildroot in a long time >> holds there: having the website in the tarball doesnt really >> make sense as it really isnt useful. > > The news page isn't, but the documentation is: > > http://buildroot.net/buildroot.html the buildroot website isnt just two pages. it'd be saner for website management (see previous comment about git checkout being all or nothing) if you added an appropriate `wget` or something to the dist target when creating the release to grab the current version of the documentation page. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
