On Friday 19 June 2009 06:59:33 walter harms wrote: > Denys Vlasenko schrieb: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Rob Landley<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've had infrastructure for that toybox for over a year. I have a big > >> todo item to port as much of the toybox infrastructure as I can back > >> into BusyBox, it's just not at the top of my todo list yet and it's a > >> big thing I'll have to do in stanges (and several bits of which are kind > >> of intrusive requiring documentation, explanation of the rationale, and > >> probably extensive discussion). > >> > >> First question: is the current test suite more closely maintained than > >> the documentation directory? > > > > Yes. Regressions are not allowed (meaning, they are checked > > and fixed, it is not bit rotting). > > > >> (Is there somebody specific caring for it, or just > >> "when the maintainer has spare time"?) > > > > I don't remember anyone specifically focusing on > > just a part of busybox. > > I do not know about your rights on busybox.net. > Is it possible to have nightly/Weekly build and run the test-suit against > it ?
the machines that host the uclibc/busybox/etc... infrastructure (i.e. website/scm/etc...) are not suitable for anything other than that. while running a buildbot daemon might be ok (we'd have to ask), building/compiling anything on them would not. this would let us farm out the regression testing to random interested parties on the list ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
