On Friday 19 June 2009 16:15:39 Rob Landley wrote: > On Friday 19 June 2009 06:25:03 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the machines that host the uclibc/busybox/etc... infrastructure (i.e. > > website/scm/etc...) are not suitable for anything other than that. while > > running a buildbot daemon might be ok (we'd have to ask), > > building/compiling anything on them would not. this would let us farm > > out the regression testing to random interested parties on the list ... > > We've got an 8-way server here that's already building nightly snapshots > for Firmware Linux, I just have to clean it up a bit to make the build more > granular, run the test suite and log the output, and set something up to > upload results. > > I.E. 90% done over here already, I'm just hip deep in something else at the > moment that I need to clear so I can update the perl removal patches for > the Linux kernel build to resubmit them ASAP so I don't miss another merge > window. > > I'll try to get you something by monday...
it's been a while since i looked at testing frameworks. last time i did, buildbot was the least crappy one out there. are you using a real framework or a set of cronjobs + custom scripts ? i'd def prefer to use something like buildbot which would allow people to plug in ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
