On 08/07/10 03:06, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Friday 06 August 2010 15:43, walter harms wrote:
this artikel may be interesting for people concerning about the rights ...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/04/gpl_violation_westinghouse/

In your (and other readers') personal opinion, is it good or bad
that we are getting this kind of "PR"?

One important detail that the company which was violating GPL
in this particular case is bankrupt at the moment; do we look bad
by making its life even harder? -

Westinghouse Digital Electronics was also ordered to hand over
equipment in its possession that contained GPL code
and forbidden to distribute devices which contained
the BusyBox software.

Your thoughts?

If they can't even turn a profit when they rip off other peoples work, maybe they need to go anyway.

A 90k fine is a piss in the ocean for this sort of company.They would likely have spend more than that trying to defend an indefensible position, so they cut their losses an did not even appear.

FSF does not dive into litigation as a first step, this action was necessary because not only was their a flagrant violation of copyright but a total refusal to comply with the licence when asked to do so.

They clearly regard the OSS community as a bunch of tossers who are too small to defend themselves and thought they were big enough to laugh off the licence terms. In view of the list of other names in that article they are not alone.

It is hard to have anything but contempt for such a contemptuous, bullying attitude.

Kick the bastards while they're down , I say.

Since they are effectively bankrupt this ruling is only a moral victory since they will probably only pay a fraction of the fine and other creditors probably have a claim on the products.

It may be a useful precedent for the other cases, though.

And yes this sort of publicity is good in making it known that FSF has enough clout to bring actions and get results.

/my2c/
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to