Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:25:04PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > I wonder about the use case for this feature? I mean busybox is meant for > small systems in general, and >=64 cores are not that small embedded > systems, at least not yet, yeah?
How you define small? Earlier you said using libc getconf is bloat (as nproc replacement) for multicore systems, but now you suggest that for cores > 64 we should't care. Where do you draw the line? Embedded systems that have lots of RAM and CPUs/cores run-time may be still limited to having a boot flash of just few megs where the whole OS image needs to fit. A. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox