On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koski...@iki.fi> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:35:46PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > Not quite sure what you are trying to achieve, but you wrote embedded > > systems _word-by-word_, and I asked for one typical example with more > than > > 64 cores where busybox is so much needed. > > I'm not trying the limit busybox usage, and I don't think there are > any "typical" embedded system. And Apple or Samsung are definitely not > any reference. But if you are happy with their HW, then good for you. > Right, so you cannot bring up any valid and real use case for this, or do not want despite the explicit clarification request, I take it. I do not think theoretical changes should be added just because it is a good technical challange. Valid use cases oughta be part of the commit message, but at worst, comment explanation without even explicit request to be fair.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
