On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Natanael Copa <n...@tanael.org> wrote: > Den 21. aug. 2014 kl. 08:42 skrev Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org>: > >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Natanael Copa <nc...@alpinelinux.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:37:00 +0200 >>> Natanael Copa <nc...@alpinelinux.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I never sent those patches upstream because I don't think this is the >>>> correct fix. For Alpine Linux the "correct" fix was to use the libc >>>> implementation and a libc that handles this properly (musl libc) >>>> together with the patch I sent to this mailing list. >>>> >>>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2014-April/080809.html >>>> >>>> Commit message didn't say it but that patch is also needed to fix the >>>> username/groupsize issue - with glibc too I believe. >>> >>> Denys, any chance that the above mentioned patch gets applied? >>> >>> Should I send a v2 with better commit message? >> >> No, please check out tito's work. That seems to be the right to do. > > we need both. > > as i understand, titos patch solves the problem for when you enable busybox's > implementation with CONFIG_USE_BB_PWD_GRP. you actually have the same problem > with it disabled, even if system implementation can handle it correctly. that > is what my patch solves.
That seem to be an irrelevant discussion in this thread, then. Should have been sent to a separate thread. This thread is about issues when CONFIG_USE_BB_PWD_GRP is enabled. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
