On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Laurent Bercot <ska-dietl...@skarnet.org> wrote: > Le 19/10/2014 15:22, walter harms a écrit : >> >> I would vote for a busybox-next (or what you call it). >> A branch that easly fold back into the main but contains all >> the recent patches. > > > That may be desirable indeed. > However, *forking* the project would be a terrible idea.
Why? If Denis does not have time for the project, then we cannot really blame him. On the other hand, if a fork could work better with someone standing up, why not? Hopefully this is not just yet another "omgz, you are forking, what a terrible person" political argument. I prefer pragmatism to politics. Cheers, L. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
