On 29 Jan 2016 21:10, Laurent Bercot wrote: > On 29/01/2016 17:50, Nicolas CARRIER wrote: > > I quite agree with dietmar, concerning uglyness... > > <shrug> That doesn't change the fact that it's the behaviour of every > init binary since 1970 and that you should come with a better reason if > you want to change it, especially since it's so easy to accomplish what > you want with a little workaround.
not really. his proposal makes busybox smaller. the only reason given for making busybox larger is "it makes `ps` 'nicer'". if there's no real technical reason for it and nothing is impacted, then shrinking busybox is a no brainer. at the very least, it makes sense to make it a config option that defaults to off. this was first changed here, but not really documented: https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=e132f4b09e5c9aedaef97f65279e8702633fd425 -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
