On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:59:41 -0500, wdlkmpx wrote: > >> I'm sure there was plenty of people willing to contribute to uclibc, >> there is even an updated fork. >> >> The project has been badly managed.. thats the only reason i can think >> of for this situation to happen > > uClibc-ng is alive at https://uclibc-ng.org/. Regular releases > (actually more regular than musl in recent months!), updated web site, > responsive maintainer, lots of cleanup in the code base, and QA effort. > > So saying that uClibc is dead is completely incorrect.
These "ng" names are not the best idea. Maybe uclibc-ng can just supersede uclibc? We can give www.uclibc.org domain (or the server itself) to it. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
