Hello, On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:25:20 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> These "ng" names are not the best idea. > > Maybe uclibc-ng can just supersede uclibc? Waldemar proposed many, many times to Bernhard to take over the project, and Bernhard essentially never replied. So it was either adding -ng or doing nothing. I think adding -ng was better than doing nothing :) And yes, I believe uClibc-ng should just supersede uClibc, or at least that www.uclibc.org should point to www.uclibc-ng.org to make more people aware of the fact that uClibc is alive again. > We can give www.uclibc.org domain (or the server itself) to it. Cc'ing Waldemar, who maintains uClibc-ng. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
