On Friday, July 19, 2019, Kang-Che Sung <explore...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There's side benefit for this patch: In case that overmount fails, we can have > a rootfs kept intact (instead of almost destroyed). >
Correction. It's just a side effect, not a "benefit" worth talking about. Speaking of, since we are now overmounting the root before zapping the initramfs, I wonder if we can remove one check about whether the new root is a mount point (this saves code size; mount() would fail with EINVAL in that case).
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
