Gray Wolf wrote:
>When printf has just single %s argument, it can be replaced with fputs,
>which is faster. One could hope that compiler would optimize that, but
>there is no reason not to use the fputs directly.

I did consider using fputs but thought it looked out of place:  all the
other output statements use printf.

Just a stylistic preference.

Ron
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to