On 02/18/21 16:56, Ron Yorston wrote:
Raffaello D. Di Napoli wrote:
Somebody recently added fputs_stdout(), to save a few bytes on each
call like this.
Hey!  I'm somebody!

I thought I remembered so, but I didn’t feel like searching to confirm :)


You should use that here as well.
No, usage_pod is a standalone build-time tool.  It doesn't have access
to fputs_stdout().

I see, my bad. And that also explains why everybody (including Denys) didn’t 
have a problem with the “wasteful” printf in the first place.


--

Raf

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to