Peter0x44 wrote: >> I've haven't signed off on them because I'd like to get a signoff from >> Peter on the first >I'm a little confused on what I'm being asked here - should I just >submit the patch again, with my git user.name changed to two words and >adding the bloatcheck? I see you've done some good changes here, and I'm >not sure whether the traffic of sending the patch again is needed. > >Or is this some legal matter with authorship, the DCO or whatever it's >called.
It's both, I think. There's an issue with BusyBox's git being configured to require names to consist of two words. And the Signed-off-by line is needed to confirm that you're OK with the DCO. >From my point of view, my first patch is based on work from both of us so I think it should include Signed-off-by lines from both of us. That should be enough to cover the lack of signoff on your original patch. Though, of course, IANAL. Ron _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
