On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 6:55 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:15:50PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > Can we replace all [s]size_t's with ints/unsigneds? We do not expect > > random pools anywhere near 4 gigabytes... > > Probably that's fine. Is the advantage to tossing out consistent types > worth it though? Does this actually save space? Since [s]size_t is > usually the word size, won't codegen not really change much?
For example, on x86-64, 32-bit insns are often shorter. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox