On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:16:41 +0200 Denys Vlasenko <vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 6:55 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:15:50PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > Can we replace all [s]size_t's with ints/unsigneds? We do not expect > > > random pools anywhere near 4 gigabytes... > > > > Probably that's fine. Is the advantage to tossing out consistent types > > worth it though? Does this actually save space? Since [s]size_t is > > usually the word size, won't codegen not really change much? > > For example, on x86-64, 32-bit insns are often shorter. > _______________________________________________ > busybox mailing list > busybox@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox Hi, shouldn't that be "was not" exceeded? - * genuine entropy: make sure disk is not full, quota was't esceeded, etc: + * genuine entropy: make sure disk is not full, quota was't exceeded, etc: Ciao, Tito _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
