From: busybox <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Nop
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 4:33 PM
> ...
> I sent that more or less same patch months ago, which was included in 
> buildroot.
> The difference with my patch is that I also removed the 2>/dev/null 
> redirection
> so that it does not hide the issue and I added a return zero because AFAIK 
> the C
> programming does not allow the main to omit the return, ...

Since C99, i. e. about 25 years:

Program termination
1 ... reaching the } that terminates the main function returns a value of 0.

--
Best regards,
Dietmar Schindler
________________________________
manroland Goss web systems GmbH | Managing Director: Franz Kriechbaum
Registered Office: Augsburg | Trade Register: AG Augsburg | HRB-No.: 32609 | 
VAT: DE815764857

Confidentiality note:
This message and any attached documents may contain confidential or proprietary 
information of manroland|Goss. These materials are intended only for the use of 
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
transmission, you are hereby notified that any distribution, disclosure, 
printing, copying, storage, modification or the taking of any action in 
reliance upon this transmission is strictly prohibited. Delivery of this 
message to any person other than the intended recipient shall not compromise or 
waive such confidentiality, privilege or exemption from disclosure as to this 
communication. If you have received this communication in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and delete the message from your system. All 
liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law.
________________________________
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to