Yep, sorry, HAD.........But well worth the $7 on Amazon used books, just for the 250 pages written by the ARRL chaps for the interpretation.
TNX ,, Chris for the correction....RH <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:10 AM Christopher Boone via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote: > The ARRL HAD......that book is no longer in publication. All they publish > now is the FCC Rules and Regulations, which you can view for free on > several websites and does not explain the rules..just lists them.. The FCC > Rule Book was a great plain English reference book. > > Chris > WB5ITT > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, 6:12 PM Rick Hiller via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> > wrote: > >> The ARRL has an excellent book "The FCC Rule Book" which is a complete >> guide to the FCC Regulations Governing Amateur Radio. >> >> Not only is Part 97 printed in its' entirety, but also included is an >> explanation of the rules and how they affect amateurs in the US and other >> ITU regions, etc. >> >> So, if you have this book or a copy of Part 97, I suggest you read 97.301 >> Authorized Frequency Bands and 97.305 Authorized Emissions Types. >> >> This will provide you with who does what as far as bands, allocations and >> "plans" for the different modes. The front part of the book, at least in >> my copy, gives the rules perspective as applied to American Amateur in >> relation to self and international rules and agreements. >> >> Have fun! Rick -- W5RH. >> >> >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> >> Virus-free. >> www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> >> <#m_-1182192255359765362_m_-6432713804203534164_m_-6406716829194631790_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:03 PM Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Finally, really, the term band plan does not appear anywhere in part 97, >>> and this is likely the reason for some discrepancy as to what it is and who >>> defines it. The FCC clearly has some regulations. Other ham organizations >>> seek to go further in the pursuit of self regulation. >>> Mark >>> >>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Mark Brantana <n5...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> For example, see the following link from Wikipedia: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio_frequency_allocations >>> >>> under "Table of amateur MF and HF bandplans" >>> [edit >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amateur_radio_frequency_allocations&action=edit§ion=16> >>> ] >>> The following charts show the voluntary bandplans used by amateurs in >>> ITU Region 1. Unlike the US, slots for the various transmission modes are >>> not set by the amateur's license but most users do follow these guidelines >>> Interesting question, though, with so many hams spreading out among many >>> different modes. And, lets not forget the part the ITU plays over top of >>> all of this. Hams can get an inexpensive copy of the latest Part 97 from >>> ARRL. >>> Mark >>> >>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Mark Brantana <n5...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> It’s complicated. See: FCC Part 97 4th ed 97.305. Shared frequencies >>> like 60-m are an exceptions to the rule. Generally I see that the FCC also >>> designates certain modes for portions of bands. These obviously have the >>> force of law. >>> >>> Band plans must comply with the regulations. I believe they are part of >>> the expectation that we can be self regulating. I don’t believe they have >>> the force of law. They may come from ARRL, and lately I have learned that >>> they may come from a state committee as well. They seem to range from very >>> strongly recommend as good practice to suggestions. >>> >>> Open to flogging if I am wrong. >>> >>> Mark >>> N5PRD >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 3:28 PM, Jeff Greer via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe band >>> allocations/band edges are set by the FCC, but the band plans are all ARRL. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* BVARC <bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org> on behalf of K5BOU via BVARC < >>> bvarc@bvarc.org> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 30, 2021 2:48 PM >>> *To:* bvarc@bvarc.org <bvarc@bvarc.org> >>> *Cc:* K5BOU <phili...@k5bou.net> >>> *Subject:* [BVARC] (no subject) >>> >>> Are this already in place or need the FCC approval? Thanks >>> >>> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ODV/Second%20Board%20Meeting%20July%202020/Doc%2025A%20Band%20Plan%20Final-1b.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> ________________________________________________ >>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club >>> >>> BVARC mailing list >>> BVARC@bvarc.org >>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org >>> Publicly available archives are available here: >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ >>> ________________________________________________ >>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club >>> >>> BVARC mailing list >>> BVARC@bvarc.org >>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org >>> Publicly available archives are available here: >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________________ >>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club >>> >>> BVARC mailing list >>> BVARC@bvarc.org >>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org >>> Publicly available archives are available here: >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rick Hiller >> *e-mail: rickhille...@gmail.com <rickhille...@gmail.com>* >> *Cell: 832-474-3713* >> *Physical: 9031 Troulon Drive* >> * Houston, TX 77036* >> >> >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> >> Virus-free. >> www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> >> <#m_-1182192255359765362_m_-6432713804203534164_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> ________________________________________________ >> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club >> >> BVARC mailing list >> BVARC@bvarc.org >> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org >> Publicly available archives are available here: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ >> > ________________________________________________ > Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club > > BVARC mailing list > BVARC@bvarc.org > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Publicly available archives are available here: > https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ > -- Rick Hiller *e-mail: rickhille...@gmail.com <rickhille...@gmail.com>* *Cell: 832-474-3713* *Physical: 9031 Troulon Drive* * Houston, TX 77036*
________________________________________________ Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club BVARC mailing list BVARC@bvarc.org http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Publicly available archives are available here: https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
