Yep, sorry, HAD.........But well worth the $7 on Amazon used books, just
for the 250 pages written by the ARRL chaps for the interpretation.

TNX ,, Chris for the correction....RH

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:10 AM Christopher Boone via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org>
wrote:

> The ARRL HAD......that book is no longer in publication.  All they publish
> now is the FCC Rules and Regulations, which you can view for free on
> several websites and does not explain the rules..just lists them.. The FCC
> Rule Book was a great plain English reference book.
>
> Chris
> WB5ITT
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, 6:12 PM Rick Hiller via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org>
> wrote:
>
>> The ARRL has an excellent book "The FCC Rule Book" which is a complete
>> guide to the FCC Regulations Governing Amateur Radio.
>>
>> Not only is Part 97 printed in its' entirety, but also included is an
>> explanation of the rules and how they affect amateurs in the US and other
>> ITU regions, etc.
>>
>> So, if you have this book or a copy of Part 97, I suggest you read 97.301
>> Authorized Frequency Bands and 97.305 Authorized Emissions Types.
>>
>> This will provide you with who does what as far as bands, allocations and
>> "plans" for the different modes.   The front part of the book, at least in
>> my copy,  gives the rules perspective as applied to American Amateur in
>> relation to self and international rules and agreements.
>>
>> Have fun!     Rick -- W5RH.
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
>>  Virus-free.
>> www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
>> <#m_-1182192255359765362_m_-6432713804203534164_m_-6406716829194631790_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:03 PM Mark Brantana via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Finally, really, the term band plan does not appear anywhere in part 97,
>>> and this is likely the reason for some discrepancy as to what it is and who
>>> defines it. The FCC clearly has some regulations. Other ham organizations
>>> seek to go further in the pursuit of self regulation.
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Mark Brantana <n5...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> For example, see the following link from Wikipedia:
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio_frequency_allocations
>>>
>>> under "Table of amateur MF and HF bandplans"
>>> [edit
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amateur_radio_frequency_allocations&action=edit&section=16>
>>> ]
>>> The following charts show the voluntary bandplans used by amateurs in
>>> ITU Region 1. Unlike the US, slots for the various transmission modes are
>>> not set by the amateur's license but most users do follow these guidelines
>>> Interesting question, though, with so many hams spreading out among many
>>> different modes. And, lets not forget the part the ITU plays over top of
>>> all of this. Hams can get an inexpensive copy of the latest Part 97 from
>>> ARRL.
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Mark Brantana <n5...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It’s complicated. See: FCC Part 97 4th ed 97.305. Shared frequencies
>>> like 60-m are an exceptions to the rule. Generally I see that the FCC also
>>> designates certain modes for portions of bands. These obviously have the
>>> force of law.
>>>
>>> Band plans must comply with the regulations. I believe they are part of
>>> the expectation that we can be self regulating. I don’t believe they have
>>> the force of law. They may come from ARRL, and lately I have learned that
>>> they may come from a state committee as well. They seem to range from very
>>> strongly recommend as good practice to suggestions.
>>>
>>> Open to flogging if I am wrong.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> N5PRD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 3:28 PM, Jeff Greer via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe band
>>> allocations/band edges are set by the FCC, but the band plans are all ARRL.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* BVARC <bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org> on behalf of K5BOU via BVARC <
>>> bvarc@bvarc.org>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 30, 2021 2:48 PM
>>> *To:* bvarc@bvarc.org <bvarc@bvarc.org>
>>> *Cc:* K5BOU <phili...@k5bou.net>
>>> *Subject:* [BVARC] (no subject)
>>>
>>> Are this already in place or need the FCC approval? Thanks
>>>
>>> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ODV/Second%20Board%20Meeting%20July%202020/Doc%2025A%20Band%20Plan%20Final-1b.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> ________________________________________________
>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>>
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> Publicly available archives are available here:
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>>> ________________________________________________
>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>>
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> Publicly available archives are available here:
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________
>>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>>
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> Publicly available archives are available here:
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rick Hiller
>> *e-mail:     rickhille...@gmail.com <rickhille...@gmail.com>*
>> *Cell:        832-474-3713*
>> *Physical: 9031 Troulon Drive*
>> *               Houston, TX 77036*
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
>>  Virus-free.
>> www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
>> <#m_-1182192255359765362_m_-6432713804203534164_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> ________________________________________________
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> Publicly available archives are available here:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>>
> ________________________________________________
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>


-- 
Rick Hiller
*e-mail:     rickhille...@gmail.com <rickhille...@gmail.com>*
*Cell:        832-474-3713*
*Physical: 9031 Troulon Drive*
*               Houston, TX 77036*
________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 

Reply via email to