Thinking about it, I have only one hacky idea for implementing it without bloating the code base, or allocating excessive bytes.
The TTL could be put into the `len` field of record when `txt` is `NULL`. Does it seems good to you guys? On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Fedor Indutny <fe...@indutny.com> wrote: > Oh right, will do it. > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <sag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 05/27/2014 12:01 PM, Fedor Indutny wrote: >> > Sure, here are attached changes. >> > >> > Please let me know if I should improve them even further. >> > >> >> Looks good to me, FWIW. >> >> Someone asked if you could add the TTL data there, maybe taking the >> same approach as ares_parse_a_reply? Something like: >> >> ares_parse_chunked_txt_reply (const unsigned char *abuf, >> int alen, >> struct ares_txt_reply **txt_out, >> struct ares_addrttl *addrttls, >> int *naddrttls) >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> - -- >> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé >> bettercallsaghul.com >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1 >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThd2tAAoJEEEOVVOum8BZR9MP/RMgT5oqH4ZmSaQ41Zo9Igpe >> qwy3SJm5YY/P/fa16uN2m7kJbyU5ksThUVj9c8PDA6fYecEqZTQMHY+we3UYOv1w >> rwp2/GqAEv3Sx6fjdQ9Rm8KVwIDQRL8wb7DlxyMYiK+Oae18tokx/gFacEUA9g0F >> ulH/uiBXgEnmDTq38H9rMTWn14PWbeHYl0XQNHDrGBAJkKuY+xnPmy+STG0ER5E0 >> dGIVfi2TgtEUhgnj6eyOqNLIV1cZDXBerUoIiXtVDejZNRSXE/Y59SPreCNgV+ZF >> l43LPVbenP2EAlFUnZSq+OcD+/kQLuYs74jgSK5K2FyBMozhkLn84Vf/oDn8C9po >> nVWpt8DmiJAlJ+QUkEU1s6SA6LWSF2ogN3ekTyFgN8buicNgS5B4xPFSqsU5E1IJ >> eigEB1Wjvsz0bJDlfxi4ztNpd/5WK7mmiexO4HBXkY+RfbWpBBKvt6DkMjJsNtQa >> XzvHsRIXIfzEp8/yigJ0gYhNkuOpaD4I5yTkbixVvbnd01dC7zON9sBNuCsqwnPj >> dRQE5QauM28hUpkBLHtsMKGRclzOMVHGb1GKewX8qSPAFRoOHRGdVr786w8afYMe >> /LZCWEJScohwq00X4JvT5qL8C6oWWqYrRXL93K1DK64tS1k5wyT/aN7F45RA1jLL >> 8n+WOaaz6krHdWV3LF+Y >> =vsvs >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >