I would use pointers, it's easier to pass in one function call rather than passing an object of what ever size.
Thanks, Tyler Littlefield Web: tysdomain.com email: [email protected] My programs don't have bugs, they're called randomly added features. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jos Timanta Tarigan To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 9:18 AM Subject: [c-prog] vector of pointer hi, when you put an object to a vector eg: vector1.push_back(object); dyou copy the object or just sending the pointer to that object? is there any point of creating a vector of pointer for efficiency stuuff? thanks in advance [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
