Vincent Massol wrote:
Yeah, I know it doesn't really matter for Stylebook, I'm just trying to move towards what I personally consider a better practice for Ant build systems: not requiring the user to copy any libraries in $ANT_HOME/lib.Hi Chris,Not sure what is the benefit of putting stylebook.jar in the build.properties. It looks more complex than just putting it in anthome/lib. I guess you want to keep your anthome/lib clean? (However stylebook does not interfere with anything else). However, I don't mind! :-)
More important than Stylebook is Checkstyle. Since the version of Checkstyle I need to build Cactus is so bleeding-edge and incompatible with the previous released versions, I can't use the same checkstyle.jar for builds of Cactus and build of my other projects. But because the Cactus build requires checkstyle.jar on java.class.path, I sort of need to keep 2 separate installations of Ant.
Anyway, there is still a problem I think with the current implementation of stylebook.jar in the build.xmls. The stylebook jar that is specified in the global build.properties will *not* get passed to the documentation subproject build. This is slightly complex to do as it must be passed only if stylebook.jar is defined.
Hmm, not sure I understand. Why doesn't it get passed? -- Christopher Lenz /=/ cmlenz at gmx.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
