2005/8/21, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 8/21/05, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So far we've always released all the Cactus components together. I guess you > > are proposing to release them separately and that's why you're proposing > > this organization, is that it?
Yes > > > > I'm not sure that releasing the components separately would require breaking > > the project into several SVN modules. You can do that within a single SVN > > module. It has the advantage of keeping the whole project cohesive. Also it > > makes it simpler for anyone building the sources. You meen create a tag for all the project when release a component... Yes it has the advantage to have the current cactus state for the component state. > > Regardless of the answer on this one, it's probably best for this to > be a post-migration discussion. Yes > > Once you get to Subversion, you can use 'svn move' to rearrange things > and keep a history of how it used to be, and how it became. As there's > only 1 cvs module involved here, and the split is only from 1 to 2, > that would be my advice :) The BIG advantage of svn ;-) Nicolas > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
