Matt Keenan wrote:
> New change of passing in the user's password as roots password to 
> om_perform_install(), in installation-screen.c, has been done and new
> webrev has been posted.
>
> All other source files are exactly the same as the previous webrev.
The changes look okay. I have couple of questions

1. Did you verify that you could assume super-user role ("su") with the 
admin user password?
2. Since we set the root password the same as the admin user password, 
do we need to tell the user in the summary panel that "the super user 
password is same as that of the administrative user?

Thanks,
Sundar
>
> cheers
>
> Matt
>
> sundar Yamunachari wrote:
>> Matt,
>>    Based on the comments from Darren Moffett, we will use the same 
>> password for both the initial user and root. Please update your code 
>> review to incorporate this change.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sundar
>>
>> Matt Keenan wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the comments Sundar.
>>>
>>> I've logged bug :
>>>   http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12204
>>>
>>> to get liborchestrator fixed, based on this can I assume the changes 
>>> here are ok
>>> to push back ?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> Sundar Yamunachari wrote:
>>>> Matt Keenan wrote:
>>>>> On test install entry in /etc/shadow for root is :
>>>>>
>>>>>   root::14537::::::
>>>>>
>>>>> Which indicates it is set to "", yet
>>>>>
>>>>>   $ su -
>>>>>
>>>>> fails as it prompts for a password, and simply pressing return 
>>>>> fails to su.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I :
>>>>>   $ pfexec passwd root
>>>>>
>>>>> And hit return twice, which should be setting root password to 
>>>>> nothing.
>>>>> Now "su -" works when I just hit return for password, also now 
>>>>> /etc/shadow
>>>>> now contains a hashed password for root.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this behaviour expected, and acceptable ?
>>>> I think that it is a regression and the problem may be with the 
>>>> orchestrator. It sets the password to "" if it is not passed. We 
>>>> need to get it fixed.
>>>>
>>>> - Sundar
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> Sundar Yamunachari wrote:
>>>>>> Matt,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    The changes look ok. The install library liborchestrator 
>>>>>> expects root password and I think it sets the root password to 
>>>>>> "", if it is not passed from the GUI. What is the root password 
>>>>>> after your test installation with the fix?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Sundar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt Keenan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are people ok with these changes going into the GUI ?
>>>>>>> Anyone get a chance to review ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt Keenan wrote:
>>>>>>>> Code review request for bug :
>>>>>>>>     1436 - Installation does not need to ask Root Password
>>>>>>>>     http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1436
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This fix also resolves bug :
>>>>>>>>     64 - GDM dosen't accept empty passwords, but setup does.
>>>>>>>>     http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=64
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Webrev :
>>>>>>>>     http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mattman/bug_1436/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The users screen has been redesigned in that root password 
>>>>>>>> entry fields have now been removed as they are not required. 
>>>>>>>> However the change also makes log-in name
>>>>>>>> and password mandatory, this will ensure that for every install 
>>>>>>>> a initial user
>>>>>>>> will be created with a password.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Testing :
>>>>>>>>   Created a install LiveCD ISO via Distro Constructor and did a 
>>>>>>>> test install
>>>>>>>>   within virtualbox.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


Reply via email to