Alexander Eremin wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:57 +0100, Jan Damborsky wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> please see my comments below. >> >> BTW, thank you very much for addressing >> cstyle issues. >> >> Jan >> >> >> boot_archive_archive.py >> ----------------------- >> >> 356 TI_ATTR_DC_RAMDISK_INODES_NUM: TI_DC_RAMDISK_INODES_DEFAULT, >> >> Ramdisk is created with 2048 bytes/inode, but looking at bug Report, >> it suggests to use optimized value 16384 instead. Why is default used ? >> >> > > > I would still leave this for boot_archive as it because free space > calculation is not done yet, but yes, we can use this number right now - > free space will be more. >
I would vote for applying this change even if the work related to boot archive size recalculation is not finished, since as you pointed out, the free space is to be increased. Also, the change would then leave 'dormant' state and will become tested. Jan
