Karen Tung wrote: [...]
> > > In regards to printing out the exact command being executed, I feel > that's very useful > information to be captured. When I debug, I often have to change the > logging function so > the the command gets printed. So, I support logging the command in > the detail log only. > That will add a lot of output to the detail log for sure, perhaps > additional blank lines > in the file will help with making it easier to read? For example, > have blank lines > printed in front of the command being executed. That way, each > command, and the output > from it will form it's own block in the log file, which should help > with readability. Hi Karen, I agree - I have filed bug 12853 to track this. Since the message will start with prefix which will identify its beginning, I think that it might be perhaps better to print empty line after the message, so that following ones are visibly separated. Jan
