Hi Jeffrey,
jeffrey huang wrote: > Hi, Jan, > > Thanks. With the work around, the install finished with success. So we > can continue test tomorrow. > > But the test to the image osol-0811-rc2-ai.iso is totally unexpected > to us. I will write to Sundar ask for the difference between this and > nightly. I was able to install using osol-0811-rc2-ai.iso image. What kind of problems are you encountering ? Jan > > Best Regards > > Jeffrey > > > > jan damborsky ??: >> Hi Jeffrey, >> >> >> jeffrey huang wrote: >> >>> Hi, Jan, >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Yes, we've tried >>> /net/osol-re.sfbay/export/home/osol_0811/output/osol-0811-rc2-ai.iso >>> image just now. It is still failed. >>> >> >> That is expected - this bug was release noted and will not be fixed in >> 2008.11 >> as acceptable and easy to use workaround exists. >> >> >>> I will change the authname to opensolaris.org >>> >>> <main url="http://10.13.28.32:9000"; >>> authname="opensolaris.org"/> >>> >>> The url, I can still using 10.13.28.32, right? >>> >> >> This is correct - restrictions apply only to authority 'name', not 'url'. >> >> >>> I will try once more. >>> >>> BTW, the downloading phase of this image is much longer than Ginnie's >>> nightly image, right? >>> Seems there more pkg to install than before. >>> >> >> The size of both images generated by Ginnie and Alan should >> be ~300MiB, so I assume that the download time would be >> almost the same. >> Prague experience is that both pipes (from .central as well as .sfbay) >> are equivalent as far as bandwith is concerned. >> >> Thanks, >> Jan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> caiman-discuss mailing list >> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >> > > -- > Great Thanks & Best Regards > > --- > Jeffrey Huang SWAN: x51683, Ext: 0086-10-62673683 > Solaris QE Group Email: jeffrey.huang at sun.com > China Engineering & Research Institute, Sun Microsystems > 7/F Chuang Xin Plaza, Tsinghua Science Park, Beijing China
