*Hi, Jan,

We do not any have problem to do the AI install. Thank very much of your 
support.

Just as you said the, things changed too rapid and something unexpected 
happened.
We are expected to come out some test result within a very short time 
window but even we do not know which image to test.
So I just write Sundar to ask for the schedule, then I can better 
arrange the test.

Thanks
Jeffrey

*
jan damborsky ??:
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
>
> jeffrey huang wrote:
>   
>> Hi, Jan,
>>
>> Thanks. With the work around, the install finished with success. So we 
>> can continue test tomorrow.
>>
>> But the test to the image osol-0811-rc2-ai.iso is totally unexpected 
>> to us. I will write to Sundar ask for the difference between this and 
>> nightly.
>>     
>
> I was able to install using osol-0811-rc2-ai.iso image.
> What kind of problems are you encountering ?
>
> Jan
>
>   
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Jeffrey
>>
>>
>>
>> jan damborsky ??:
>>     
>>> Hi Jeffrey,
>>>
>>>
>>> jeffrey huang wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi, Jan,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Yes, we've tried 
>>>> /net/osol-re.sfbay/export/home/osol_0811/output/osol-0811-rc2-ai.iso
>>>> image just now. It is still failed.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> That is expected - this bug was release noted and will not be fixed in 
>>> 2008.11
>>> as acceptable and easy to use workaround exists.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> I will change the  authname to opensolaris.org
>>>>
>>>>                 <main url="http://10.13.28.32:9000"; 
>>>> authname="opensolaris.org"/>
>>>>
>>>> The url, I can still using 10.13.28.32, right?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> This is correct - restrictions apply only to authority 'name', not 'url'.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> I will try once more.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, the downloading phase of this image is much longer than Ginnie's 
>>>> nightly image, right?
>>>> Seems there more pkg to install than before.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> The size of both images generated by Ginnie and Alan should
>>> be ~300MiB, so I assume that the download time would be
>>> almost the same.
>>> Prague experience is that both pipes (from .central as well as .sfbay)
>>> are equivalent as far as bandwith is concerned.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>   
>>>       
>> -- 
>> Great Thanks & Best Regards
>>
>> ---
>> Jeffrey Huang                  SWAN: x51683, Ext: 0086-10-62673683
>> Solaris QE Group                      Email: jeffrey.huang at sun.com
>>            China Engineering & Research Institute, Sun Microsystems
>>          7/F Chuang Xin Plaza, Tsinghua Science Park, Beijing China
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>   

-- 
Great Thanks & Best Regards

---
Jeffrey Huang                  SWAN: x51683, Ext: 0086-10-62673683
Solaris QE Group                      Email: jeffrey.huang at sun.com
           China Engineering & Research Institute, Sun Microsystems
         7/F Chuang Xin Plaza, Tsinghua Science Park, Beijing China

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/caiman-discuss/attachments/20081120/0c0ad3fa/attachment.html>

Reply via email to