Susan Sohn wrote: > On 05/29/09 14:13, Ethan Quach wrote: >> >> >> Susan Sohn wrote: >>> Hi Ethan, >>> >>> Since the problem statement was on the same page as the >>> requirements, I read it again. Should there be something in there >>> about observability? It would be good to have a way to know what was >>> derived. >> >> Whatever manifest that is used to install the system with is >> already copied onto the install system today; the final derived >> manifest is also going to be living at the same location during >> the install run as when a non-derived manifest is used. > > Seems to me like the problem statement should reflect the need even if > the design accounts for it already.
Ok. > >> Do you mean to make the fact that the client got it manifest >> via derivation observable? > > From a support perspective, I would want that to be clear. Okay, I think that would have been done anyway, but I'll add it to the problem statement as you request to make it clear. thanks, -ethan > > Sue > >> -ethan >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sue >>> >>> On 05/28/09 13:57, Ethan Quach wrote: >>>> Minutes from Wednesday's meeting: >>>> >>>> Attendees: Ethan, Ginnie, Clay >>>> >>>> >>>> Summary >>>> ---------------- >>>> Agreed on the requirements. The requirements list has been updated. >>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/ai_design/DerivedProfilesProblemStatment/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Clay had an issue with allowing the decision on whether to mirror >>>> disks or not to be derivable. It is a requirement for now, but further >>>> discussion needs to be had on why this is objected to. >>>> >>>> SVM config removed. >>>> >>>> Extensibility was heavily discussed. This is still a requirement, >>>> but at this point we do not know if it is feasible to provide full on >>>> extensibility of the list of client attributes that are desired to >>>> derive >>>> a manifest from. The level of extensibility supported will need >>>> to be determined. >>>> >>>> >>>> Next step is discuss solution proposals. Proposals will be sent >>>> out to caiman-discuss. >>>> >>>> Plan to have a reviewable draft of a functional spec out by >>>> 6/5/09 >>>> >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> -ethan >>>> >>>> >>>> Ethan Quach wrote: >>>>> Meeting Wednesday 5/27/09 to discuss derived profiles. >>>>> Ginnie's and Sanjay's presence requested. All others welcomed. >>>>> >>>>> Goals of the meeting: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1. Discuss and agree upon which requirements we will address >>>>> from list here: >>>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/ai_design/DerivedProfilesProblemStatment/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2. Next steps - solution proposals, functional spec. Who will >>>>> be doing what? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Meeting logistics: >>>>> ------------------------- >>>>> Wednesday 5/27 10am PT / 11am MT / 1pm ET >>>>> >>>>> Duration: 1 hr >>>>> US Toll-Free: 866-839-8145 >>>>> Caller Paid: 215-446-3660 >>>>> Acess code: 8264768 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> -ethan >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >>> >
