Hi Clay,

> Hi Sarah,
>     Comments in-line.
>                                 Thank you,
>                                 Clay
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2009, Sarah Jelinek wrote:
>
>> Hi Ethan,
>>
>> I have some comments/questions:
>>
>> In the requirements list:
>>>
>>>     * Allow derivation process to arbitrarily get rules from some
>>>       external source (external to the AI server, e.g. a database, 
>>> cmdb).
>>>
>>
>> -What is the purpose of this? What types of rules do we envision 
>> might come from an external source? I know we talked some about this 
>> last week, so I am wondering if in subsequent discussions you all 
>> came up with use cases that provide support for this requirement.
>
> The thought is that data might be derived out of something like a CMDB 
> (configuration management DB) for example at a large site like 
> Network.COM, while some admins may use something more simple like our 
> test lab which used to have machine location in a comment in the NIS 
> maps.
>

>> -Should we allow supporting of specification of a software payload 
>> that may not be IPS? The requirement says "i.e. the packages to 
>> install". Which I interpret as 'that is'. So, it seems like we are 
>> limiting the payload to be packages only. Is this the intent?
>>
>> -It isn't currently listed that we want to support deriving non-disk 
>> targets to install onto.  We can derive disk setup, and derive which 
>> disk to install onto, but the more general requirement here, I think, 
>> would be to say we will support deriving which target to install 
>> onto. This is something I can imagine would be needed for replication 
>> and recovery.
>
> I'm not sure I follow what you mean by installing to a non-disk 
> target. Do you mean installing to a VM or a replication archive?
>
Nevermind... I was thinking incorrectly about the use of AI. I think a 
disk target is correct, in that we always start with some disk type to 
create the subsequent environment we want to install in to.

thanks,
sarah
*****
>> thanks,
>> sarah
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Minutes from Wednesday's meeting:
>>>
>>> Attendees: Ethan, Ginnie, Clay
>>>
>>>
>>> Summary
>>> ----------------
>>> Agreed on the requirements.  The requirements list has been updated.
>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/ai_design/DerivedProfilesProblemStatment/
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> Clay had an issue with allowing the decision on whether to mirror
>>> disks or not to be derivable.  It is a requirement for now, but further
>>> discussion needs to be had on why this is objected to.
>>>
>>> SVM config removed.
>>>
>>> Extensibility was heavily discussed.  This is still a requirement,
>>> but at this point we do not know if it is feasible to provide full on
>>> extensibility of the list of client attributes that are desired to 
>>> derive
>>> a manifest from.  The level of extensibility supported will need
>>> to be determined.
>>>
>>>
>>> Next step is discuss solution proposals.  Proposals will be sent
>>> out to caiman-discuss.
>>>
>>> Plan to have a reviewable draft of a functional spec out by
>>> 6/5/09
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> -ethan
>>>
>>>
>>> Ethan Quach wrote:
>>>> Meeting Wednesday 5/27/09 to discuss derived profiles.
>>>> Ginnie's and Sanjay's presence requested.  All others welcomed.
>>>>
>>>> Goals of the meeting:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1.  Discuss and agree upon which requirements we will address
>>>>     from list here:
>>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/ai_design/DerivedProfilesProblemStatment/
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> 2.  Next steps - solution proposals, functional spec.  Who will
>>>>    be doing what?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Meeting logistics:
>>>> -------------------------
>>>> Wednesday 5/27  10am PT / 11am MT / 1pm ET
>>>>
>>>> Duration:            1 hr
>>>> US Toll-Free:      866-839-8145
>>>> Caller Paid:         215-446-3660
>>>> Acess code:         8264768
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> -ethan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>


Reply via email to