Tim Knitter wrote: > Hello, > > Could Ethan and/or Evan or anyone else for that matter review this snap2 > project fix which is against the snap_upgrade WS? I'm sending this out as a > separate review since this is a bug found during the system test phase of the > project and it isn't covered in the main webrev (3686) > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tsk/3734/ > > This was tested on opensolaris bld 88. The test revealed the following output > when the user was non-privaleged: >
I hope you meant 98 there... > os% beadm destroy be2 > Are you sure you want to destroy be2? This action cannot be undone(y/[n]): y > Unable to destroy be2. > You don't have enough permissions to execute this command. > Either use 'pfexec' to execute the command or become superuser. > Is this really the only case in which we should be printing a permissions error? If not, can we try to fix at least some of the others while you're at it? For i18n purposes, contractions are discouraged. Also, it's not permissions, but privileges which are lacking. Perhaps something like: Unable to destroy be2 due to insufficient privileges. Either use pfexec to execute the command, or become superuser. Dave
