Dave and all,

I fixed all the other cases I could find where we should print out an 
insufficient privileges message. I successfully tested again on bld 98 as an 
unprivileged user and the messages are displayed properly.

http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tsk/3734/

Thanks
Tim

Tim Knitter wrote:
> 
> Dave Miner wrote:
>> Tim Knitter wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Could Ethan and/or Evan or anyone else for that matter review this 
>>> snap2 project fix which is against the snap_upgrade WS? I'm sending 
>>> this out as a separate review since this is a bug found during the 
>>> system test phase of the project and it isn't covered in the main 
>>> webrev (3686)
>>>
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tsk/3734/
>>> This was tested on opensolaris bld 88. The test revealed the following 
>>> output when the user was non-privaleged:
>>>
>> I hope you meant 98 there...
>>
> 
> Yes. A little dyslexia there.
> 
>>> os% beadm destroy be2
>>> Are you sure you want to destroy be2? This action cannot be 
>>> undone(y/[n]): y
>>> Unable to destroy be2.
>>> You don't have enough permissions to execute this command.
>>> Either use 'pfexec' to execute the command or become superuser.
>>>
>> Is this really the only case in which we should be printing a 
>> permissions error?  If not, can we try to fix at least some of the 
>> others while you're at it?
> 
> Yeah there are probably other places that could use this message. Thus the 
> reason to keep it rather generic. I'll search and replace where it is needed.
> 
>> For i18n purposes, contractions are discouraged.  Also, it's not 
>> permissions, but privileges which are lacking.  Perhaps something like:
> 
> Right. I came to that conclusion after reading this again after Joe replied.
> 
>> Unable to destroy be2 due to insufficient privileges.  Either use pfexec 
>> to execute the command, or become superuser.
> 
> Yeah that is better. 
> 
> Thanks
> Tim
> 
>> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to